in

Telligenti

Serving up fresh ideas every day, Telligent style

Jay Leask's Blog

August 2008 - Posts

  • Have you hugged your developer today?

    Scott Watermasysk posted this video today, a video from the guys at devshop.  It's absolutely genius, a fantastic mockumentary of what it's like to be an in house developer ... it does hit consulting, just not in the same way, WE are who your project got consulted out to; hopefully you never get our product back half-done though.

  • See Films Differently

    For years now people, as a whole, have gotten more and more status quo.  We stop thinking for ourselves; worry too much about the opinions of others; act in ways that would be appeasing to others.  How rarely now we actually do things because WE think it's cool.

    Every time you hear someone to act/think "outside the box" [ phrases.org.uk ] you are hearing societies admittance that as a society we are too often not ... too often acting/being/thinking along the status quo.  Let us not forget the catch-22 here, however, act too much your own person and we get comments like "why can't you act like..." or "that's how it's always been done" [ jeff bridges ].

    Tell me you don't remember television trying to make us all (or your kids all)want to be "like Mike" [ adverblog.com ]?

    I should say, before I go any further, I love these sayings.  It's taken me quite a long time to become my own person, as much as I can that is.  As great an upbringing I have had, and as many opportunities as my parents gave me, there are two people in particular that I look at and say "they helped me realize to be myself":  my cousin James and my college photo professor Shah ... whose full name I totally can't remember.  James taught this by example, often to the extreme, but I've never forgotten that example.  Shah had a saying, I'm sure others have used it before him, "Do you"; he said it constantly, always with a warm, kind tone.  To this day I use it myself.

    Back to the reason for today's blog inspiration ... Volkswagen would like us to See Films Differently. Yes, the car manufacturer ... wants us to see Films differently.  Over the random connection?  Actually it makes quite a bit of sense: they support independent films and filmmakers (6 years running); independent films, albeit becoming the "in" thing over the past decade or so, are not status quo; Volkswagen gets people like me to think of their name when thinking of not status quo because of their support of the "not" status quo.  It's rather convoluted and if I had a flow chart it would wrap back and forth again and again ... but you get the picture.

    Check out the videos, they are fantastic and, while they aren't necessarily how I feel about these movies, they give us reason to think ...

    Allow me to onclude by placing my opinion on the broader topic: BE YOURSELF, DO YOU, THINK OUTSIDE THE BOX, DON'T BE A LEMMING!  Whatever phrase you prefer ... Just Do It! [ CFAR ]

  • QueryOverrides and the GroupsToSearch attribute

    QueryOverrides allow great customizations to lists (WeblogPostList / IndexPostList / etc) including page sizes, sections to search on, sort instructions and much more.

    In this particular case I need to search by multiple sections.  While the SectionApplicationKeysToSearch or SectionIDsToSearch options would work, Community Server has blog groups, making it easy to group blogs together.  Conveniently the QueryOverrides have the option GroupsToSearch ... should be easy, and in fact it is; once you know what to put there.

    The amazing wealth of information over at GetBen.com has about 99.9% of everything you could need to know about CS controls ... including the instructions that CS expects a string value for this option.  What took me hours to figure out (because, apparently, my head wasn't in quite the right frame of mind) was that the GroupsToSearch is actually looking for a comma (see? string!) separated list of integers, the IDs of the groups you wish to search on.

    So, while I was putting in: GroupsToSearch="MyGroup,MyOtherGroup"; what was expected, and the reason I was getting the Input string was not in a correct format error, was GroupsToSearch="3,5"

    I hope this helps someone save a few minutes compared to what I lost this evening ...

  • Custom Post Pages for site workflow

    We recently had a client who required a custom post page for workflow purposes:

    Please create role "DraftPosts" and allow them to create posts in the "Workflow" blog but only save drafts, not publish.  Also, please make sure they use the site skin, not the control panel skin

    Fairly simple with a few "gotcha" steps.

    1. Create the new role "DraftPosts"
      image
    2. Update "Workflow" blog permissions to allow "DraftPosts" to manage content
      image
      image

    That's fairly simple, but step 2, which I forgot, can cause quite a bit of headache if missed.  The next step is creating your Post Editor page; it's also fairly straight forward.

    1. From /ControlPanel/Blogs/ copy CreateEditBlogPost.ascx and PostEditor.aspx (and associated .cs & .resx pages) to your new location.  You'll want the new location to have access to the appropriate theme, so I put it in /Themes/leanandgreen/common/.
    2. Update both pages so the class names are unique.  I renamed them to DraftPostsPostEditorPage  and DraftPostsCreateEditBlogPost respectively.
    3. Update both ASPX pages: inherit from the updated code behind pages and pointing them to the correct master pages.  ex.:
              <%@ Page language="c#" Codebehind="DraftPostsPostEditor.aspx.cs" AutoEventWireup="false"
              Inherits="CommunityServer.ControlPanel.Blogs.DraftPostsPostEditorPage"
              MasterPageFile="~/Themes/leanandgreen/common/master.Master" %>
    4. Assign the Workflow blog section ID to the CSContext:

              override protected void OnInit(EventArgs e)
              {
                  .......
                  MyWeblogSectionID = Weblogs.GetWeblog("Workflow").SectionID;
    5.             CSContext.Current.SectionID = MyWeblogSectionID;
                  .......

              }

    Lastly, remember they only want the user to be able to save, not publish.  There are various ways of doing this and by far likely better ways than I chose to.  That said, I just hid the "Publish" button!

    Good luck, and don't hesitate to let me know if the above steps didn't work for you!

  • The State of Healthcare in the US

    Friday I saw a presentation at Rotary called "The Coming Tsunami - Health Care and Retirement Crisis".  It got me thinking a great deal and I have a handful of notes that I want to discuss, things I need to research so I can talk more factually about the subject, rather than just putting thoughts down.

    Then I got an email from an acquaintance of mine with the subject "Ala. To Charge Obese Workers $25 Monthly" and this got me thinking a great deal ... and yes I actually found a news article to back this email, more than one, but here's a link for you [ clicky ] thanks to News 5 Kansas City.

    I'm all for things like this to a point ...  as long as they are focusing on HEALTH and not WEIGHT than yah, cool.  The issue being most people define obesity by number of pounds.  My bone structure will NEVER fit the healthy model. 

    There are many different calculations out there, "Metropolitan Life", "Devine", "Robinson", "Miller", "Hamwi" ... I'm sure many more that I am missing.  However they all suggest that, as a man of 6'2", I weight between 160lbs and 200lbs, approximately.

    Allow me to divulge a bit of personal information to help prove my thoughts.  As of my last BMI measurements I weigh 305lbs; I carry approximately 116 pounds of fat (that'd 38%, down from my previous 42%, go me!).  Now, the process I use to take my BMI is guaranteed If you take my total weight (305) and subtract every pound of fat I carry (116) you get 189lbs, towards the high end of the SUGGESTED weight: that's 0% body fat.

    With minimal research I am unable to find proper citations for this, however, for men it is recommended to carry between 8% and 17% body fat ... NOT 0!  Taking my 0% weight (189) that's between 204lbs and 222lbs.  As you can see at 8% body fat I'm still ABOVE the recommended weight for my height.

    Let me take this one step further still ... at 222lbs, just 17% body fat above my estimated 0% measurement, I would be 22lbs over the suggested weight for my height.  That's an EXTRA 10% body fat, which puts me at 17% body fat, which calculates me as OBESE when you only consider weight.

    What I haven't mentioned, btw, is that in the past when I have applied for solo coverage health care (not part of my company, but all on my lonesome) I have been disqualified PURELY based on my height and weight - this is not a claim, it was the process that occurred.

    In short, what we are seeing is a culture of people who feel like they have no choice but to be overweight because we have a capitalistic society that uses the most beneficial calculations for the success of the business owner, instead of a society that looks at the benefit for the society at a whole.  Yikes, I know, it sounds kind of socialist doesn't it?

  • Mid-summer [Hockey] System Reboot ...

    *AHEM* Does anyone still read this thing?  Not sure why you would, but thanks if you do!  Scott and I are going to be getting together in the coming month to begin planning for, what we hope to be, our best (and most complete) season covering the Stars yet. 

    Logistics will be more difficult as I now live more than 60 miles from where we have been recording over the past 2 years, but I have faith we'll come up with a solution you can be proud to listen to!

    But really, as we get into our 3rd (4th overall) season of covering the Dallas Stars, and the NHL as a whole, I ask you, our dear dozen or so readers, what do you want from us?

    Is consistency enough?  Do you want specific interviews?  Do you want us to cover more/less of the NHL?  More/Less game details? More AHL news? A new host? One of us gone (too bad)? Do you have ideas that you could contribute regularly yourself?  Would you like to be part of our news blogging team?

    Tell us what would make the Dallas Stars Podcast something worth visiting more; what would get you to tell your friends about us; and we'll do our damn best to get it done!

    So swing by the Dallas Stars Podcast website, give us a read, and check out our live podcasts ... we'll be recording again soon!

    Yours in Hockey

    Jay 'The Wall' Leask

Powered by Community Server (Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems